Skip to main content

When Bitcoin Hits $100K and AI Goes Mainstream: Whose Revolution Are We Really Watching?



Over the last decade, two seismic waves have taken shape in the digital realm. On one hand, we have the cryptocurrency movement, championed by Bitcoin and its ideological siblings, seeking to redefine money and power structures. On the other, artificial intelligence (AI)—and especially its recent breakout star, generative AI (GenAI)—is slipping into our everyday lives, reshaping how we work, create, and interact. As Bitcoin edges toward a mythical $100,000 valuation, and AI quietly proliferates, a fascinating contrast emerges: Are we witnessing the technological upheaval crypto once promised, or are we seeing existing institutions reinforced by the subtle genius of AI?

Bitcoin’s Institutional Crown—and Limited Utility

For years, Bitcoin has been heralded as digital gold, a hedge against uncertainty and the ultimate “people’s money.” If it hits $100K, it will symbolically confirm its acceptance by the very institutions it once aimed to circumvent. Big players—banks, asset managers, and even governments—are no longer dismissing it. They’re endorsing it through ETFs, custody solutions, and strategic investments, giving Bitcoin a legitimacy that’s been almost unthinkable just a few years ago.

Yet this adoration from the financial elite hasn’t unlocked Bitcoin’s practical potential as a medium of exchange, a unit of account, or a platform for complex applications. Its technological capabilities remain largely static. While Bitcoin’s role as a store of value is increasingly clear, its “utility” for everyday commerce or enterprise use-cases pales in comparison to what many other crypto networks can offer. In other words, Bitcoin hasn’t disrupted the system—it’s been embraced by it. The revolution it supposedly led now looks more like an annexation.

Ethereum’s Ideals vs. Institutional Reality

No blockchain ecosystem has embodied a more radical ideology than Ethereum’s. Its adherents envision a world without trusted intermediaries, where power is distributed, not consolidated, and where code-based governance trumps old-school hierarchies. Ethereum’s smart contracts introduced the concept of decentralized finance (DeFi), decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), and NFT marketplaces. The promise was (and for many, still is) to topple institutions—or at least force them into a new mold.

But the reality is more complex. While Ethereum’s ecosystem thrives with experimentation and innovation, the broader world seems inclined to preserve institutional frameworks. Governments, large corporations, and established financial outfits have spotted opportunity in the crypto space and stepped in. They’re not tearing down the walls of their old houses to move into a trustless utopia; instead, they’re borrowing crypto’s most appealing features—like tokenization or new financial instruments—and layering them onto the existing system. Meanwhile, institutions’ embrace of Bitcoin as a digital asset class only legitimizes and reinforces these same structures. The Ethereum crowd’s dream of a radically different order is running up against the resilience—and adaptability—of incumbents.

GenAI: A Quiet, Institutional Friendly Revolution

While crypto struggles between revolution and co-option, AI has quietly integrated itself into our daily work and professional environments. Generative AI is reshaping job titles, rewriting productivity tools, and enhancing creativity, all within the boundaries of the current economic and political order. Rather than seeking to eliminate trusted third parties, GenAI works beautifully alongside them.

From automated customer support to improved supply chain analytics, AI is strengthening the existing system. It empowers companies to do more with less, improves institutional efficiency, and (at least for now) doesn’t threaten the structural integrity of our institutions. Governments and corporations welcome AI as a growth engine, not an existential threat. The result? AI’s radical potential is being deployed to refine the old machine rather than smash it.

Contrasting Outcomes: Crypto’s Dreams vs. AI’s Realities

Put these two forces side-by-side and the contrast is stark. Crypto—especially in its more decentralized and ideological corners—wanted to redefine how we trust, transact, and organize. AI simply wants to optimize what we already trust, how we already transact, and how we’re already organized.

If Ethereum’s ethos aimed to erode our reliance on traditional gatekeepers, AI’s rapid adoption and tangible benefits might make those same gatekeepers even more indispensable. With institutions now more efficient and adaptive due to AI-driven insights, why uproot them entirely? Rather than being toppled, the old guard is modernizing. It’s as if Ethereum is trying to persuade a world to abandon the old infrastructure just as that infrastructure is about to get a massive technological upgrade.

The Future: Reinforcement Over Revolution?

As Bitcoin flirts with mainstream acclaim and AI weaves itself deeper into our professional and personal fabric, one can’t help but wonder which narrative will define the future. Will blockchain-based networks eventually deliver on the promise of reshaping power from the ground up? Or will they remain a speculative asset class and niche ecosystem while AI cements and augments existing institutions?

One plausible outcome is that the “revolution” crypto once promised might turn out to be more of a catalyst for incremental changes, not the wholesale disruption its ideologues imagined. Bitcoin’s rise shows us that institutions can absorb and legitimize even the most countercultural innovations. AI’s ascent shows us that technology can be a tool for entrenchment as well as for change.

Ultimately, the story unfolding before us suggests that the existing order is far more resilient, flexible, and tech-savvy than many in the crypto space expected. While Ethereum’s idealists still rally around decentralization, the rest of the world is busy using AI to refine and bolster the status quo. As Bitcoin reaches new heights, and AI becomes a standard feature of working life, we might discover that the revolution we were promised doesn’t come from dismantling institutions—but from watching them evolve into something even more deeply integrated with the technology they once feared.


(Disclaimer: ChatGPT wrote this text - I gave the initial idea in the form of a prompt)

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The case for central bank digital currency as public infrastructure to enable digital assets

I have dabbled a fair amount with all sorts of crypto currencies and their respective permissionless networks. In fact, I have been dabbling since 2012 which is by my last count a whopping 12 years. While I have always maintained that I do believe the general concept for digitization and programmability of assets is on the right path, its implementation, the user experience, the accessibility, the fraudulent activities, and the overall inefficiencies permissionless DLTs have, never made me into a true believer. I have stated that opinion on several occasions, here , here and here . There are still barriers to entry when it comes to digitization of assets: sustainable- and interoperable infrastructure. To illustrate this, I recently asked a notary public here in Zurich, why they can’t store the notarized documents as PDFs, the answer surprised me: because they must keep records for at least 70 years. Now, think about what would have happened if we stored these documents on floppy disks...
Post a Comment
Read more

I've Been Vibe Coding for 2 Months, Here's What I Believe Will Happen

In the past few months, I've embarked on an experiment that has fundamentally changed how I approach software development. I've been "vibe coding" - essentially directing AI to build software for me without writing a single line of code myself. This journey has been eye-opening, and I'd like to share what I've learned and where I think this is all heading. My Vibe Coding Journey I started vibe coding with Claude and Anthropic's Sonnet 3.5 model, later upgrading to Sonnet 3.7, Claude Code, and other tools. My goal was straightforward but comprehensive: create a CRM system with all the features I needed: Contact management (CRUD operations, relationships, email integration, notes) Calendar management (scheduling meetings, avoiding conflicts) Group management for organizing contacts A campaign system with templates A standalone application using the CRM's APIs for external contacts to book meetings direct The technical evolution of this project was inter...
Post a Comment
Read more

Vibe Coding Alert! How I Rebuilt a Wix Site and Fed the “AI Will End SaaS” Panic

My better half is an artist and maintains a Wix.com site. For the second time in two years, Wix decided to raise the hosting fees. That’s when I suggested to my spouse that I could rebuild the website and host it on Firebase (where I host most of my projects). I assumed this wouldn’t be a big deal (I was wrong) and started researching ways to use a lightweight CMS with Firebase support. Such a system exists — it’s called FireCMS — and it’s excellent. Before I dive deeper, here’s her original site (no longer a paid Wix site):  Miyuki's WIX site Her instructions were clear: replicate it as closely as possible. So I went to work. I created a product development document with use cases, scope, screenshots from the original site, the required features, and of course FireCMS integration. I used ChatGPT to draft the document, then set up a new Firebase instance, and finally launched the Vibe Coding agent (Claude Code). The process wasn’t too different from my other projects, but what sur...
2 comments
Read more