Skip to main content

When Bitcoin Hits $100K and AI Goes Mainstream: Whose Revolution Are We Really Watching?



Over the last decade, two seismic waves have taken shape in the digital realm. On one hand, we have the cryptocurrency movement, championed by Bitcoin and its ideological siblings, seeking to redefine money and power structures. On the other, artificial intelligence (AI)—and especially its recent breakout star, generative AI (GenAI)—is slipping into our everyday lives, reshaping how we work, create, and interact. As Bitcoin edges toward a mythical $100,000 valuation, and AI quietly proliferates, a fascinating contrast emerges: Are we witnessing the technological upheaval crypto once promised, or are we seeing existing institutions reinforced by the subtle genius of AI?

Bitcoin’s Institutional Crown—and Limited Utility

For years, Bitcoin has been heralded as digital gold, a hedge against uncertainty and the ultimate “people’s money.” If it hits $100K, it will symbolically confirm its acceptance by the very institutions it once aimed to circumvent. Big players—banks, asset managers, and even governments—are no longer dismissing it. They’re endorsing it through ETFs, custody solutions, and strategic investments, giving Bitcoin a legitimacy that’s been almost unthinkable just a few years ago.

Yet this adoration from the financial elite hasn’t unlocked Bitcoin’s practical potential as a medium of exchange, a unit of account, or a platform for complex applications. Its technological capabilities remain largely static. While Bitcoin’s role as a store of value is increasingly clear, its “utility” for everyday commerce or enterprise use-cases pales in comparison to what many other crypto networks can offer. In other words, Bitcoin hasn’t disrupted the system—it’s been embraced by it. The revolution it supposedly led now looks more like an annexation.

Ethereum’s Ideals vs. Institutional Reality

No blockchain ecosystem has embodied a more radical ideology than Ethereum’s. Its adherents envision a world without trusted intermediaries, where power is distributed, not consolidated, and where code-based governance trumps old-school hierarchies. Ethereum’s smart contracts introduced the concept of decentralized finance (DeFi), decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), and NFT marketplaces. The promise was (and for many, still is) to topple institutions—or at least force them into a new mold.

But the reality is more complex. While Ethereum’s ecosystem thrives with experimentation and innovation, the broader world seems inclined to preserve institutional frameworks. Governments, large corporations, and established financial outfits have spotted opportunity in the crypto space and stepped in. They’re not tearing down the walls of their old houses to move into a trustless utopia; instead, they’re borrowing crypto’s most appealing features—like tokenization or new financial instruments—and layering them onto the existing system. Meanwhile, institutions’ embrace of Bitcoin as a digital asset class only legitimizes and reinforces these same structures. The Ethereum crowd’s dream of a radically different order is running up against the resilience—and adaptability—of incumbents.

GenAI: A Quiet, Institutional Friendly Revolution

While crypto struggles between revolution and co-option, AI has quietly integrated itself into our daily work and professional environments. Generative AI is reshaping job titles, rewriting productivity tools, and enhancing creativity, all within the boundaries of the current economic and political order. Rather than seeking to eliminate trusted third parties, GenAI works beautifully alongside them.

From automated customer support to improved supply chain analytics, AI is strengthening the existing system. It empowers companies to do more with less, improves institutional efficiency, and (at least for now) doesn’t threaten the structural integrity of our institutions. Governments and corporations welcome AI as a growth engine, not an existential threat. The result? AI’s radical potential is being deployed to refine the old machine rather than smash it.

Contrasting Outcomes: Crypto’s Dreams vs. AI’s Realities

Put these two forces side-by-side and the contrast is stark. Crypto—especially in its more decentralized and ideological corners—wanted to redefine how we trust, transact, and organize. AI simply wants to optimize what we already trust, how we already transact, and how we’re already organized.

If Ethereum’s ethos aimed to erode our reliance on traditional gatekeepers, AI’s rapid adoption and tangible benefits might make those same gatekeepers even more indispensable. With institutions now more efficient and adaptive due to AI-driven insights, why uproot them entirely? Rather than being toppled, the old guard is modernizing. It’s as if Ethereum is trying to persuade a world to abandon the old infrastructure just as that infrastructure is about to get a massive technological upgrade.

The Future: Reinforcement Over Revolution?

As Bitcoin flirts with mainstream acclaim and AI weaves itself deeper into our professional and personal fabric, one can’t help but wonder which narrative will define the future. Will blockchain-based networks eventually deliver on the promise of reshaping power from the ground up? Or will they remain a speculative asset class and niche ecosystem while AI cements and augments existing institutions?

One plausible outcome is that the “revolution” crypto once promised might turn out to be more of a catalyst for incremental changes, not the wholesale disruption its ideologues imagined. Bitcoin’s rise shows us that institutions can absorb and legitimize even the most countercultural innovations. AI’s ascent shows us that technology can be a tool for entrenchment as well as for change.

Ultimately, the story unfolding before us suggests that the existing order is far more resilient, flexible, and tech-savvy than many in the crypto space expected. While Ethereum’s idealists still rally around decentralization, the rest of the world is busy using AI to refine and bolster the status quo. As Bitcoin reaches new heights, and AI becomes a standard feature of working life, we might discover that the revolution we were promised doesn’t come from dismantling institutions—but from watching them evolve into something even more deeply integrated with the technology they once feared.


(Disclaimer: ChatGPT wrote this text - I gave the initial idea in the form of a prompt)

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Will smart phone cameras be better than digital mirrorless cameras?

  If you believe Terushi Shimizu or rather, the way the press is formulating it , then camera phones will have better image quality in 2024 than your trusty DSLR or mirrorless digital camera. He backs this up with sensor technology advancements and computational photography. He has a point.     However, as a digital camera enthusiast myself, I must strongly disagree with this point of view. The message might be interpreted in such way that its meaning reflects a view that we are no longer bound by physics to get the best image quality.     The thing is this, the bigger your camera sensor, the more photons it can capture. However, this comes at the realization that big sensors require big lenses which in turn makes the camera big and heavy. I’m simplifying of course, but that’s physics. For camera makers it is therefore always a question of tradeoffs: do you want better image quality or do you want a smaller and lighter camera. Camera phones or cameras in smartph...
Post a Comment
Read more

Apples Vision Pro Headset strategy is all about its Arm-chips.

  Apple has given us a vision of what their VR and AR future might entail. But as have others pointed out numerous times, the whole point of the showcase at the WWDC 23 was to let people experiment, I’ve heard others say that it’s like the launch of the Apple Watch when Apple didn’t really know what would become of it. This is similar and yet different.  Just like the Apple Watch (and the iPad before it), Apple sought to porting its whole ecosystem onto a watch – granted, the Apple Watch can’t live on its own and a better comparison would probably be the iPad. The iPad can live without any other Apple device and unlike the iPhone, never really had a clearly defined function other than to watch movies and browse the web. It was not until it gained the ability to be used with a pencil that artists and designers started to explore the potential.  I’m trying to point out that Apple took 5 years from the first iPad in 2010 to the iPad Pro with pencil in 2015 to find its “kille...
Post a Comment
Read more

The new shiny armor of AI

If we listen to the media, business leaders, and the press, we should be getting behind the AI wagon because of its potential to automate many of the processes everyday companies struggle with. I don’t dismiss this notion entirely because I think it’s true if you have the ability to integrate this technology in a meaningful way. For example, the startup company " scrambl " (full disclosure, I’m a minority investor) is making use of gen-AI by "understanding" CVs (curriculum vitae) from applicants and identifying the skills to match them to open positions. This works great – I have seen this in action, and while there are some misses, most of that "normalization of skills" works. There are other promising examples, such as Q&A systems to understand the documentation of a complex environment. When combined with RAG ( retrieval augmented generation ), this has the potential to significantly reduce the time it takes to make complexities understandable. But ...
Post a Comment
Read more