Skip to main content

Will superwallets power HarmonyOs



I read the Wallstreet Journal story about the unveiling of Huawei’s “new” HarmonyOs and felt that a couple of points were “conveniently” left out of the reporting.

So, yes HarmonyOs is a new microkernel design that aims to supersede the current Linux kernel in Android OS, however, that doesn’t mean it can’t run Android apps. In fact, porting existing Android apps over is in the best case a simple recompile. In the worst case it’s probably stripping out any Google dependencies. But even that can be helped if Huawei is smart enough to provide its own “Google Mobile Service” layer with the same APIs. So in short, I’m not sure a new operating system would be such a big deal as long as all the APIs and libraries are present. In an ironic twist, the Trump administration gave Huawei “permission” to run its own operating system and Google doesn’t like it at all. But not for the reason they are saying, the so called “security threats” are a smokescreen - Google is really scared of a new competitor that has the power to break-up the Google ecosystem. If Huawei is going in that direction, Samsung might as well… 

To understand what that means, we have to understand the numbers involved here and also ask a very basic question: “at what point do you have enough users (critical mass) to sustain a  true platform business?”. In other words, when do you attract enough developers to your platform on a sustained basis? We could use Apple as a way to measure this a bit.

Apple is selling now less than 200 million iPhones per year and has slipped to the third spot in iPhone sales numbers. We also know that Apple has sold 2.2 billion phones since 2007 and of those phones, Apple claims it has 900 million active iPhone users (and 1.4 billion overall Apple device users).

Huawei has 500 million phones in circulation in 170 countries, and it’s now selling 200 million phones a year. So Apple has an ecosystem advantage of 400 million users. However, at these dimensions, I suspect Huawei could very well run it’s own distribution.  In fact they are already doing so in China today. Yes, Huawei’s Android based operating system that is on every Chinese Huawei phone is in fact already Google-free because Google doesn’t operate in China and the Chinese government doesn’t want foreign companies to gain access to their citizen’s data.

So, why talk about Hongmeng or HarmonyOs when Huawei already has a “theoretical” solution? Why wouldn’t they just forge ahead and take the best part of the open source android and build that out?

I suggested that it would make sense for Huawei to forge ahead with this plan not just because it would “free” them from Google, it is also possibly a requirement in Europe because of the Google unbundling ruling and it has strategic ramifications where Huawei could clearly mark its own territory. 


But the real reason for Hongmeng or HarmonyOs has much more to do with creating their own independent codebase for all their devices. Huawei tries to solve two things: a) dependency from foreign influences and b) complete ownership of intellectual property. Think about it this way: Apple pursues the same strategy with iOS, MacOs, WatchOs, iPadOS etc. It’s all based on the same codebase and it is fully Apple owned. A single codebase simplifies things tremendously. You can avoid a lot of redundancies by doing that and ultimately go to market faster and save costs.

The real question is if they can actually pull this off for the non-Chinese market where Microsoft and Google dominate and thus attract software companies and developers. There have been many such attempts in the past to break those “monopolies” and every time it failed because of lack of third-party software.

I think this time is different and I give this one a good chance to succeed because of two reasons: the ecosystem advantage that Huawei has in its home market and the rise of super wallets. If they can make it work with tight integration of all the must-haves services and apps (Alipay, WeChat, Grab, WhatsApp, Facebook etc. etc.) then I suspect users will no longer see a big difference between Android. And that might just be enough to launch a new operating system and slowly roll it out elsewhere. Also, the fact that they will have developer tools and maybe even better incentives for developers will probably help along.

Let’s see how this turns out.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Will smart phone cameras be better than digital mirrorless cameras?

  If you believe Terushi Shimizu or rather, the way the press is formulating it , then camera phones will have better image quality in 2024 than your trusty DSLR or mirrorless digital camera. He backs this up with sensor technology advancements and computational photography. He has a point.     However, as a digital camera enthusiast myself, I must strongly disagree with this point of view. The message might be interpreted in such way that its meaning reflects a view that we are no longer bound by physics to get the best image quality.     The thing is this, the bigger your camera sensor, the more photons it can capture. However, this comes at the realization that big sensors require big lenses which in turn makes the camera big and heavy. I’m simplifying of course, but that’s physics. For camera makers it is therefore always a question of tradeoffs: do you want better image quality or do you want a smaller and lighter camera. Camera phones or cameras in smartph...
Post a Comment
Read more

Apples Vision Pro Headset strategy is all about its Arm-chips.

  Apple has given us a vision of what their VR and AR future might entail. But as have others pointed out numerous times, the whole point of the showcase at the WWDC 23 was to let people experiment, I’ve heard others say that it’s like the launch of the Apple Watch when Apple didn’t really know what would become of it. This is similar and yet different.  Just like the Apple Watch (and the iPad before it), Apple sought to porting its whole ecosystem onto a watch – granted, the Apple Watch can’t live on its own and a better comparison would probably be the iPad. The iPad can live without any other Apple device and unlike the iPhone, never really had a clearly defined function other than to watch movies and browse the web. It was not until it gained the ability to be used with a pencil that artists and designers started to explore the potential.  I’m trying to point out that Apple took 5 years from the first iPad in 2010 to the iPad Pro with pencil in 2015 to find its “kille...
Post a Comment
Read more

The new shiny armor of AI

If we listen to the media, business leaders, and the press, we should be getting behind the AI wagon because of its potential to automate many of the processes everyday companies struggle with. I don’t dismiss this notion entirely because I think it’s true if you have the ability to integrate this technology in a meaningful way. For example, the startup company " scrambl " (full disclosure, I’m a minority investor) is making use of gen-AI by "understanding" CVs (curriculum vitae) from applicants and identifying the skills to match them to open positions. This works great – I have seen this in action, and while there are some misses, most of that "normalization of skills" works. There are other promising examples, such as Q&A systems to understand the documentation of a complex environment. When combined with RAG ( retrieval augmented generation ), this has the potential to significantly reduce the time it takes to make complexities understandable. But ...
Post a Comment
Read more