Skip to main content

Will Libra change the world?



I have some history with this – no, not directly but I’ve been researching the various attempts that Facebook made in order to enable their user base to make person to person as well commercial payments. I could be wrong but none of these efforts seemed to have panned out for Facebook. Case in point, Facebook has had an e-money license for their Irish and Spanish subsidiaries for nearly three years – this licenses are in theory “passportable” throughout Europe which would have given Facebook the opportunity to offer some form of payment service throughout the EU. I’ve known of some implementations in France and the UK but never anything that would have enabled them to go cross-border. In other words, Facebook has had to deal with the same payment fragmentation landscape in Europe and elsewhere than the rest of us. When Facebook officially threw in the towel by shutting down the P2P payment service on its messenger platform, I knew this was ominous.

On the other hand, and like so many, I’ve been pondering use cases for the blockchain and cryptocurrencies for years and wondered if there ever will be a use case that is worth solving for. As much as I like using DLT for public directories, or keeping track of digital assets – I’ve never felt that a real problem would be solved with any of these approaches and of course, with cryptocurrency as a payment form, you really only solve the cross-border problem but at an immense cost to usability and convenience and so far it’s not necessarily better than the banking system – it’s more like black-market shadow of the former that follows a decentralized approach. In both cases, Facebook and Cryptocurrencies, I gave up looking for answers.

Until this week with the official announcement that Facebook is issuing a stablecoin and it has some serious partners – PayPal, UBER, Spotify, Stripe, VISA and MasterCard and more that have each invested resources. When the first news piece about Facebook’s cryptocurrency surfaced, I didn’t make much of it – I felt it’s another big player that is moving with the times. However, the announcement from this week could be a leapfrogging event – or at the very least, a dramatic change in the payments game. I would go so far as to say: this is as geeky for payment heads as was the landing of the Falcon 9 rockets on the maiden voyage of Falcon heavy for space geeks. I know it’s far-fetched but it was more about the realization that this might be an event that will keep us occupied for the foreseeable future.

Right, and why exactly?

Payments is a global mess. Every country is doing it differently. Every country is at a different level of standardization, electrification and digitization – there are no two countries alike. In a world with nearly 200 countries and more than 7 billion people, this creates tremendous amounts of inefficiencies – not just globally, or regionally – it goes all the way from micro-payments to wire-transfers even in a hyper-local environment. I keep saying in my presentations how crazy it is that Facebook has gone from virtually 0 users to 2.5 billion MAU in something like 15 years. There has never been anything like that in the whole world since civilization started. In other words, if you wanted to clean up something as fragmented as the payment landscape, you would probably just want to throw a layer over it that standardizes how we pay at a global level. And to do that with some success you need critical mass and an ecosystem. Facebook has both!

One thing I know, this could be the most user-friendly payment system- while at the same time, it has the most users. To me, this could very well end up being another WeChat Pay or Alipay – but for the rest of the World. Which brings up all the various points in how influential this could become and how it has the potential to change society – especially in countries and regions where leapfrogging would most likely happen because of stability issues in the system (inflation, emerging markets etc.) Instead of trying to see where we could be headed with such a global payment platform (think Star Trek) I have a couple of questions that I hope Facebook and the regulators can answer:

1.      "We" know Facebook is looking to create an open association that can manage the ecosystem. How prepared is Facebook to deal with the regulatory- and legal challenges that will come? 

2.      Will the central banks perceive this as a threat or as a truly welcoming effort to combat cash and other nontransparent money movement schemes? How much control do they want to exert on such a platform? Will they become nodes on the DLT?

3.      Will the users have sufficient trust in this platform (in fact they must trust it more or equally than their trust in their existing FIAT scheme)

 Any other points here would be highly appreciated – feel free to comment.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Will smart phone cameras be better than digital mirrorless cameras?

  If you believe Terushi Shimizu or rather, the way the press is formulating it , then camera phones will have better image quality in 2024 than your trusty DSLR or mirrorless digital camera. He backs this up with sensor technology advancements and computational photography. He has a point.     However, as a digital camera enthusiast myself, I must strongly disagree with this point of view. The message might be interpreted in such way that its meaning reflects a view that we are no longer bound by physics to get the best image quality.     The thing is this, the bigger your camera sensor, the more photons it can capture. However, this comes at the realization that big sensors require big lenses which in turn makes the camera big and heavy. I’m simplifying of course, but that’s physics. For camera makers it is therefore always a question of tradeoffs: do you want better image quality or do you want a smaller and lighter camera. Camera phones or cameras in smartphones, have changed this
Post a Comment
Read more

Apples Vision Pro Headset strategy is all about its Arm-chips.

  Apple has given us a vision of what their VR and AR future might entail. But as have others pointed out numerous times, the whole point of the showcase at the WWDC 23 was to let people experiment, I’ve heard others say that it’s like the launch of the Apple Watch when Apple didn’t really know what would become of it. This is similar and yet different.  Just like the Apple Watch (and the iPad before it), Apple sought to porting its whole ecosystem onto a watch – granted, the Apple Watch can’t live on its own and a better comparison would probably be the iPad. The iPad can live without any other Apple device and unlike the iPhone, never really had a clearly defined function other than to watch movies and browse the web. It was not until it gained the ability to be used with a pencil that artists and designers started to explore the potential.  I’m trying to point out that Apple took 5 years from the first iPad in 2010 to the iPad Pro with pencil in 2015 to find its “killer-app”. But th
Post a Comment
Read more

The new shiny armor of AI

If we listen to the media, business leaders, and the press, we should be getting behind the AI wagon because of its potential to automate many of the processes everyday companies struggle with. I don’t dismiss this notion entirely because I think it’s true if you have the ability to integrate this technology in a meaningful way. For example, the startup company " scrambl " (full disclosure, I’m a minority investor) is making use of gen-AI by "understanding" CVs (curriculum vitae) from applicants and identifying the skills to match them to open positions. This works great – I have seen this in action, and while there are some misses, most of that "normalization of skills" works. There are other promising examples, such as Q&A systems to understand the documentation of a complex environment. When combined with RAG ( retrieval augmented generation ), this has the potential to significantly reduce the time it takes to make complexities understandable. But
Post a Comment
Read more